About Me

Name: Proud Lib
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Modern-day Judemitarbeiter

"For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country". We know the insinuation is that this member of the liberal intelligensia has had no reason to be proud of America before, since this is an evil, racst, exploitative nation founded by white males for the specific purpose of oppressing other races and maintaining a system of slavery that was cruely enforced by the whip and the rope. This mentality that evolved from the 1960's counter-culture has since evolved into the "hate America" movement which currently reigns over our Nation. The question remains, however, how do these communistic America-haters manage to get into power?
 
William Ayers history as a founding member of the infamous Weather Underground has been well documented. Ayers has been described as an "unrepentant terrorist", but how is this determination reached? Much of the controversy about Ayers during the decade since 2000 stems from an interview he gave to The New York Times on the occasion of the memoir's publication. The reporter quoted him as saying "I don't regret setting bombs" and "I feel we didn't do enough", and, when asked if he would "do it all again," as saying "I don't want to discount the possibility." How did the United States of America elect a President who has such close and direct ties to a man such as this? Or Reverend Jeramiah Wright? Or Saul Alinsky?
 
While the MSM is undoubtedly to blame for much of the misinformation disseminated to the general populace, there is more to the story. The "MSM propoganda machine" is a misnomer designed to deflect attention from the real agents of hate, the people running the media, the people running ACORN, and the people propogating and maintaining the lies circling the internet.
 
I do not believe that the average "liberal" really understands the destruction that the liberal Democrats are trying to accomplish in this country. The MSM (used for the sake of ease) tell these people what they want to hear, supporting the "feel-good" mentality that they have been indoctrinated into by the government education system, and parrot back the talking points whenever questioned. Discussing issues with the average, uneducated liberal is an exersize in duckspeak. There is no actual thought put into their arguments, and even less application of common sense. Although they are far from educated, and unable to cogently argue for the system of government that they support, they are far from being actually complicit with the real agents of hate. The average democrat is best described as a sheep, bleating what they are told by their masters and being run in the correct direction by the herding dogs of the MSM.
 
The REAL problem are the "Judemitarbeiter" (Jewish collaborators in Nazi Germany and Poland), the collaborators who do know the truth, who do think cogently and make a conscious choice to propogate the lies as truth to the sheep.
 
The period of Nazi rule in Germany was, arguably, one of the worst periods in the history of the Jewish people. Accepted estimates are that 6 million Jews were murdered during this period, with 1.5 million of these being children. Yet not all Jews ended up in the concentration camps. Some lived hiding in the slums, some escaped to Palestine, and some became Judemitarbeiter - Jewish collaborators. The Jüdische Ordnungsdienst, as the Jewish police in the ghettos were called, furnished thousands of men for seizure operations.  In the Warsaw ghetto alone the Jewish police numbered approximately 2500; in Lodz they were about 1200 men strong; the Lvov ghetto had an Ordnungsdienst of 500 men; and so on. (Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, Quadrangle Books, Chicago, 1961, p. 310) These Jews gave up their fellows to the Germans. They fingered the dissent leaders and let the Germans know where the Jews were hiding. Almost all the administrative tasks and policing required by the Nazis was placed in Jewish hands, that Jewish collaborators were ubiquitous, and that it was Jewish collaborators who rendered the Jewish Holocaust feasible and who stood as obstacles in the path of Jewish resistance.  Note, particularly, that the children of the Warsaw ghetto were taught to fear the Jewish collaborator more than the Ukrainian collaborator. Practically all of the kapo officers were academicians - persons with degrees - who behaved like wild beasts and at times were more cruel than the Nazis.
 
This country has it's share of evil people such as these collaborators. They are the people running the media, the people running ACORN, and the people propogating and maintaining the lies circling the internet. These are the people who, on the hope of gaining their own measure of power, enable the America haters and make excuses for their every action. Without the media, Obama would never have been elected. Can any thinking, rational adult actually believe that Obama had more executive experience than John McCain? Sarah Palin? Taking the politics out of the equasion, and applying logic, it is simply idiotic to believe that based on experience alone, Obama was the better candidate. The media and apologists can't take the politics out of the discussion since it is all about politics to them, and the natual follower of politics, power. These people want their power, and are willing to throw everything aside; logic, thought, and any of us that oppose their agenda, to get it. We must take it SERIOSLY when people such as "Hal Donahue" state on these message boards that they will be "out taking pictures" at Tea Parties so he will "know who they are." These are the modern-day equivalents to the Jewish and Ukrainian collaborators.
 
This is the mentaility of evil: Take notes so you have information to trade for your own pathetic life. The "Hal's" of the internet are the evil directors telling the sheep how to think and doing their best to distort the level thinking of people trying to educate the sheep that socialism not only has failed EVERYWHERE is has been tried, but is nothing more than a path to power for those that propogate the ideology. Hal knows socialism is a failed idea, he just believes that by kowtowing to the party, he will be given a part of the power that the people are consolidating for themselves. Silly Hal, don't you know that the Nazis sent their collaborators to the ovens as well? If you do escape the ovens, then the compatriots of your victims will take revenge for them. In Letter to the editor by Prof. Israel Shahak (published on 19 May 1989 in Kol Ha'ir, Jerusalem. Available online at:
http://www.kaiwan.com/codoh/newsdesk/890519.HTML) Prof. Shahak writes: "One of my own strongest memories is that, when the Jewish underground killed a despicable collaborator close to my home at the end of February 1943, I danced and sang around the still bleeding corpse together with the other children.  I still do not regret this, quite the contrary."
 
History has the unusual knack of repeating itself. We are seeing the syncophatic mewlings of the MSM and blogospere glorying the actions of their masters in the democratic party as it rockets us down the road towards socialism. All who cry out agasinst the tryany we see evolving are targeted as "right-wing radicals" and placed under Homeland Security watch. I know that this blog is being read, and my identity noted as an agitator. I don't need Hal to inform on me, I inform on myself. If my ideals should lose to tryany, then my memory will be no more. I will, however, be able to stand before my G-d and say, "I did my best".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The next Afganistan - NOT!

The Obama administration has unequivicaly stated that the war in Afganistan is the most pressing issue that America needs to address - "The Afghan government needs to do more. But we have to understand that the situation is precarious and urgent here in Afghanistan. And I believe this has to be our central focus, the central front, on our battle against terrorism," Obama said Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation."
"I think one of the biggest mistakes we've made strategically after 9/11 was to fail to finish the job here, focus our attention here. We got distracted by Iraq," he said." http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/20/obama.afghanistan/
 
While his dedication to the Afgan war is commendable, regardless of his - and the left in generals - disdain and disregard for the victorious war in Iraq, the broader picture is being missed.
 
Militant Islamics have not been "cornered in the caves" aling the Afgan-Pakistani border region. Quite the contrary, they has made drastic insurgent gains into the heart of Pakistan. From the Swat region to the Buner region, a previously peaceful district on the Indus River just 60 miles (100 kilometers) northwest of the capital, Islamabad. I don't think the importance of this action can be minimized. We have seen how the Taliban acts when they have control of an area; imposition of Sharia law, with all it's attendant atrocities and support for militant Islamists dedicated to the destruction of Isreal and the West. We hem and haw about North Korea launching a missile, and Iran "pursuing" nuclear weapons, but consider, Pakistan is a nation that already has nuclear weapons... The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) estimates that Pakistan has built 24-48 HEU-based nuclear warheads, and Carnegie reports that they have produced 585-800 kg of HEU, enough for 30-55 weapons. Pakistan's nuclear warheads are based on an implosion design that uses a solid core of highly enriched uranium and requires an estimated 15-20 kg of material per warhead. According to Carnegie, Pakistan has also produced a small but unknown quantity of weapons grade plutonium, which is sufficient for an estimated 3-5 nuclear weapons.
 
Can we, for even a second, contemplate what this means? The militant Taliban has infiltrated and tested the defenses of a region 60 miles from the national capital. How will we oust a nuclear-armed Taliban from Islamabad should they managed to overthrow the current regime? In September 2006, Pakistan's president Pervez Musharraf signed a controversial peace agreement with seven militant groups, who call themselves the "Pakistan Taliban." Pakistan's army agreed to withdraw from the area and allow the Taliban to govern themselves, as long as they promise no incursions into Afghanistan or against Pakistani troops. Critics say the deal handed terrorists a secure base of operations; supporters counter that a military solution against the Taliban is futile and will only spawn more militants, contending that containment is the only practical policy.

The Taliban rescinded the cease-fire in July 2007 after clashes between government troops and radical Islamist clerics and students at Islamabad's Red Mosque. Big surprise? Next will be the overthrow of the current regime ruling Pakistan and control of the nuclear arsenal. Does the President have the stones for an all-out nuclear war in the sub-continental region? Will he be able to pull the trigger, most likely dooming millions of Pakistani and Indian (Pakistan will most assuradly attack their long-time enemy over the Kasmiri region in any major war) civians to death? How about if Tel-Aviv or Haifa goes up in a mushroom cloud? Yes Truman was a Democrat who did have the stones to launch a nuclear attack, but that was a different Democratic party. Will Obama? The fact that we DON'T know if he will should send shudders down the spine of any American who loves the national treasures of Washington D.C., New York, or Los Angeles. These great cities would most assuredly be prime targets of a nuclear-armed militant Islamic state. The Taliban was complicit in the 9/11 attacks, of that there is no argument, even from the extreme fringe of the lunatic left. Can we imagine that the "Pakistani Taliban" would hesitate to arm Al-Queda with a couple of their nuclear weapons? Can we fathom what a nuclear attack on American soil would do?
 
Make no mistake, the Taliban is determined to enlarge their spere of influence and control. They will at some time in the future attempt to wrest control of Pakistan from the current regime, and gain control of a major nuclear weapons arsenal.
 
What will the United States do then?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »